Da ja in Server 2012 sowie Windows 8 jeweils der Hyper-V in Version 3 vorhandden sein wird habe ich mich gefragt ob es etweilige unterschiede geben wird.
Hat der Hyper-V Dienst unter Windows 8 den kompletten Umfang wie unter dem Server OS?
Server 2012 / Windows 8 Hyper-V unterschiede
Erstellt von
fusi666
, 03. Aug 2012 07:03
2 Antworten in diesem Thema
#2
Necron
-
-
- 10.856 Beiträge
Moderator
Geschrieben 03. August 2012 - 07:16
Hi,
ich hatte noch zu Betazeiten eine Folie als Übersicht genau dazu gemacht. Da zu Betazeiten vielleicht nicht mehr 100% richtig.
Funktionen, Client Hyper-V, Server Hyper-V:
ich hatte noch zu Betazeiten eine Folie als Übersicht genau dazu gemacht. Da zu Betazeiten vielleicht nicht mehr 100% richtig.
Funktionen, Client Hyper-V, Server Hyper-V:
- Hyper-V Replica, Nein, Ja
- Network Virtualization, Nein, Ja
- VM Live Migration, Nein, Ja
- Shared Nothing Live Migration, Nein, Ja
- SR-IOV, Nein, Ja
- Failover Clustering, Nein, Ja
- Virtual Fibre Channel, Nein, Ja
- RemoteFX, Nein, Ja
- SLAT, Wird vorausgesetzt, Nicht vorausgesetzt
- Live Storage Migration, Ja, Ja
- PowerShell/Automation, Ja, Ja
- Extensible Virtual Switch, Ja, Ja
- Dynamic Memory, Ja, Ja
Gruß
Daniel
-Daniel's Tech Blog-
#3
fusi666
-
-
- 67 Beiträge
Newbie
Geschrieben 03. August 2012 - 08:46
dank dir Necron für die Mühe!
jetzt hab ich`s gefunden im Netz
Here are the some of the key differences in Windows 8 Client Hyper-V from Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V:
No Hyper-V Replica
No Hyper-V Network Virtualization
No Virtual Machine Live Migration (Requires Failover Clustering only in Windows Server)
No Shared Nothing Live Migration
No SR-IOV (You need server class hardware; appropriate firmware, etc; you won’t find this on desktops)
No Failover Clustering (Client doesn’t include Failover Clustering)
No Virtual Fiber Channel
No RemoteFX GPU Hardware Acceleration ( which requires RDV only in Windows Server)
Second Level Address Translation (SLAT) HW required
And the commonalities between Windows 8 Hyper-V & Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V
Virtual Machines created with Client Hyper-V are 100% compatible with Server Hyper-V
Client Hyper-V offers the same VM scale as Server
Up to 64 virtual processes per VM
Up to 64TB per virtual disk ( vhdx format )
Up to 1 TB of memory per VM.
Live Storage Migration is included
Support VHD Storage on SMB3 file shares
100% PowerShell/WMI compatibility in management from Client to Server.
Client Hyper-V offers the full rich, open and extensible Hyper-V virtual switch.
QoS, bandwidth management and other advanced virtual switch capabilities are in there
Quellen:
http://devonenote.co...server-hyper-v/
http://social.techne...ival-guide.aspx
jetzt hab ich`s gefunden im Netz
Here are the some of the key differences in Windows 8 Client Hyper-V from Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V:
No Hyper-V Replica
No Hyper-V Network Virtualization
No Virtual Machine Live Migration (Requires Failover Clustering only in Windows Server)
No Shared Nothing Live Migration
No SR-IOV (You need server class hardware; appropriate firmware, etc; you won’t find this on desktops)
No Failover Clustering (Client doesn’t include Failover Clustering)
No Virtual Fiber Channel
No RemoteFX GPU Hardware Acceleration ( which requires RDV only in Windows Server)
Second Level Address Translation (SLAT) HW required
And the commonalities between Windows 8 Hyper-V & Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V
Virtual Machines created with Client Hyper-V are 100% compatible with Server Hyper-V
Client Hyper-V offers the same VM scale as Server
Up to 64 virtual processes per VM
Up to 64TB per virtual disk ( vhdx format )
Up to 1 TB of memory per VM.
Live Storage Migration is included
Support VHD Storage on SMB3 file shares
100% PowerShell/WMI compatibility in management from Client to Server.
Client Hyper-V offers the full rich, open and extensible Hyper-V virtual switch.
QoS, bandwidth management and other advanced virtual switch capabilities are in there
Quellen:
http://devonenote.co...server-hyper-v/
http://social.techne...ival-guide.aspx
