|
Hi daking,
igmp/mcast ist nicht im Einsatz.
pbr - Policy Based Routing nein, aber wir haben VRF
show platform tcam utilization
CAM Utilization for ASIC# 0 Max Used
Masks/Values Masks/values
Unicast mac addresses: 400/3200 90/620
IPv4 IGMP groups + multicast routes: 144/1152 6/26
IPv4 unicast directly-connected routes: 400/3200 90/620
IPv4 unicast indirectly-connected routes: 1040/8320 22/109
IPv4 policy based routing aces: 384/512 1/2
IPv4 qos aces: 768/768 388/388
IPv4 security aces: 1024/1024 27/27
Note: Allocation of TCAM entries per feature uses
a complex algorithm. The above information is meant
to provide an abstract view of the current TCAM utilization
show controller CPU
ASIC Rxbiterr Rxunder Fwdctfix Txbuflos Rxbufloc Rxbufdrain
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASIC0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ASIC1 0 0 0 0 0 0
ASIC2 0 0 0 0 0 0
ASIC3 0 0 0 0 0 0
ASIC4 0 0 0 0 0 0
ASIC5 0 0 0 0 0 0
ASIC6 0 0 0 0 0 0
cpu-queue-frames retrieved dropped invalid hol-block stray
----------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
rpc 279227604 0 0 0 0
stp 257580916 0 0 0 0
ipc 26116003 0 0 0 0
routing protocol 811688788 0 0 0 0
L2 protocol 19301345 0 0 0 0
remote console 0 0 0 0 0
sw forwarding 3800158745 0 0 0 0
host 5539150 0 0 0 0
broadcast 404564382 0 0 0 0
cbt-to-spt 0 0 0 0 0
igmp snooping 406175019 0 0 0 0
icmp 692939 0 0 0 0
logging 0 0 0 0 0
rpf-fail 0 0 0 0 0
dstats 0 0 0 0 0
cpu heartbeat 443184417 0 0 0 0
Wir stochern immer noch im dunkeln, aber wir haben in einem Vlan Trafic gesehen, der der CPU-Auslastung gleicht. Aber die Serverjungs können oder wollen nicht helfen.
LG
JP
|